|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Ultimate: Abortion: Partial-Birth Abortion Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SENATE PASSES PARTIAL BIRTH ABORTION BAN 63-34, 10/21/99
Washington - The Senate Thursday again approved ban partial birth
abortions but fell at least two votes shy of the crucial 67 votes needed
to overturn President Clinton's promised veto.
Since 1995, both the House and Senate have repeatedly voted to ban this
gruesome abortion procedure, which pro-life advocates rightly compare to
infanticide. But the Senate has not been able to override Clinton's veto.
The vote was 63-34, with three senators absent. If those three had voted
the same way they had in the past, the ban would have picked up one
supporter since the 1998 Congressional elections, but would still be two
votes short of the 67 needed to override the veto.
Fourteen Democrats joined 49 Republicans in backing the ban. Three
Republicans joined 31 Democrats in opposing it.
The White House has said Clinton would veto it again. ``It has been our
position from the beginning that if the bill comes down in this form, we
will veto it as we have in the past,'' Clinton spokesman Joe Lockhart
said.
Proponents of a ban said partial-birth abortions are never medically
necessary, although their legislation does include an exemption to save a
woman's life.
``I have hundreds of letters from obstetricians. This is never, never
medically necessary,'' said Pennsylvania Republican Rick Santorum, the
lead sponsor of the ban.
During the debate, Santorum and his allies have shown medical charts and
drawings of the partial-birth abortion. They show an unborn child being
partly extracted from the womb feet first, scissors inserted in the skull
and the brain removed to collapse the head before the unborn child is
killed.
``It is barbaric. It is killing. It is cruel,'' said Illinois Republican
Peter Fitzgerald. ``It is inhumane.''
While acknowledging there are no reliable independent numbers, Santorum
cited estimates that partial-birth abortions are used about 5,000 times a
year in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.
Santorum amended his bill in an attempt to provide a clearer definition of
partial-birth abortion. His new definition said the procedure is used when
an ``intact living fetus'' is delivered ''partially outside of the
mother.''
Santorum said he hoped the more specific language would satisfy courts,
which have struck down ``partial birth'' bans in about 20 states as
unconstitutional.
Douglas Johnson of the National Right to Life Committee said that if the
Senate does not get the few extra votes needed to override the veto
``thousands of babies will continue to be pulled feet-first from the womb
while alive, and then brutally killed.''
Pro-life Republican Senators Connie Mack of Florida and Judd Gregg of New
Hampshire - who both voted yes in last year's override attempt - were
absent. So was pro-abortion Repubilcan Senator John Chafee of Rhode
Island, who voted no last year.
Santorum described the debate as a moral attack on a brutal medical
procedure that involves partially delivering a live fetus before emptying
its skull and killing it.
``This is not an attempt to change or overturn Roe vs. Wade,'' he said.
``At least we should be able to draw the line that when a child is in the
process of being born, it's too late to have an abortion.''
The partial-birth abortion issue also has caused pro-abortion Democrats
some political discomfort.
Senator Harkin (D-IA) was attacked in television commercials over the
issue in 1996, and dropped sharply in the polls before recovering. More
recently, the Senate's Democratic leader, Tom Daschle of South Dakota, and
Sen. Ernest Hollings of South Carolina, got behind the pro-life measure
before their re-elections in 1998.
During debate Thursday, another Democrat suggested he, too, might support
the bill.
Sen. Bob Kerrey, D-Neb., an abortion supporter, told Santorum he was
troubled by the abortion procedure and ``keeping an open mind'' on his
vote, after opposing the ban the last time around. Kerrey is among the
senators up for re-election next year. In the end, however, Kerrey stuck
with his 'no' vote. Below is the roll call vote.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Visit other sites created by Women and Children First! |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Women and Children First. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||